|
Post by The Commish on Feb 18, 2009 5:30:49 GMT -5
The amazing thing is, she is almost 50 and still looks fantastic!!!
|
|
|
Post by tidewater on Feb 18, 2009 20:09:16 GMT -5
How old is she exactly?
|
|
|
Post by The Commish on Feb 18, 2009 20:12:20 GMT -5
She was born August 28, 1960 so that makes her 48.
|
|
|
Post by robertluvsholly on Feb 18, 2009 20:23:30 GMT -5
She does look fantastic and it appears to be natural! I love that she hasn't gone under the knife. It just never looks right! She is too beautiful...LOL 1992 was a great hair year for both Robert and Holly ;D Now, i wanna see them in 2009!
|
|
|
Post by scruffy on Feb 18, 2009 20:26:28 GMT -5
she is 48yrs 171 days. LOL that's what you get for asking an accountant about figures:D
And yes she does look great
|
|
|
Post by tidewater on Feb 19, 2009 8:57:06 GMT -5
she is 48yrs 171 days. LOL that's what you get for asking an accountant about figures:D And yes she does look great If I were 48 yrs and 172 days, I wouldn't want someone referring to me as 'almost fifty.' ;D I hope I look as good when I hit 48 yrs and 172 day!
|
|
|
Post by lakesgirl on Feb 19, 2009 14:18:36 GMT -5
She does look fantastic and it appears to be natural! I love that she hasn't gone under the knife. It just never looks right! She is too beautiful...LOL 1992 was a great hair year for both Robert and Holly ;D Now, i wanna see them in 2009! I think that's what I like about her looks the most. She looks natural. I can't stand actors and actresses who look fake. Their job is to emote and if they can't move their face, they can't emote. I saw a picture of Dolly Parton in the paper today and she looked awful. I suppose you could say she looked young but she looked like a different person. She looked awful. My husband agreed. What ever happened to growing old gracefully?
|
|
|
Post by tidewater on Feb 19, 2009 17:22:40 GMT -5
She does look fantastic and it appears to be natural! I love that she hasn't gone under the knife. It just never looks right! She is too beautiful...LOL 1992 was a great hair year for both Robert and Holly ;D Now, i wanna see them in 2009! I think that's what I like about her looks the most. She looks natural. I can't stand actors and actresses who look fake. Their job is to emote and if they can't move their face, they can't emote. I saw a picture of Dolly Parton in the paper today and she looked awful. I suppose you could say she looked young but she looked like a different person. She looked awful. My husband agreed. What ever happened to growing old gracefully? Well Dolly is Dolly. She has been allot of things but grace has never been on of them. ;D
|
|
|
Post by The Commish on Feb 19, 2009 17:45:36 GMT -5
she is 48yrs 171 days. LOL that's what you get for asking an accountant about figures:D And yes she does look great If I were 48 yrs and 172 days, I wouldn't want someone referring to me as 'almost fifty.' ;D I hope I look as good when I hit 48 yrs and 172 day! Ah so that's what was behind asking for the exact figure. LOL. Sorry I stand by my statement, she's almost 50. LOL. I'm pretty sure Emma won't see it and be offended.
|
|
|
Post by scruffy on Feb 19, 2009 19:18:46 GMT -5
she is 48yrs 171 days. LOL that's what you get for asking an accountant about figures:D And yes she does look great If I were 48 yrs and 172 days, I wouldn't want someone referring to me as 'almost fifty.' ;D I hope I look as good when I hit 48 yrs and 172 day! Hell, I wish I looked that good at 38 yrs and 172 days
|
|
|
Post by robertluvsholly on Feb 19, 2009 19:31:20 GMT -5
I was told there would be no math.
|
|
|
Post by mike on Feb 22, 2009 12:46:35 GMT -5
Emma does look amazing and natural. It is so freaky to me when some of these actors faces just change into something that almost doesn't even look quite human.
|
|
|
Post by tidewater on Feb 24, 2009 14:27:47 GMT -5
I've been watch the 92 clips that RobertAnnafan has been posting and I never realized that Nanny was working with Fason even before she showed up in PC. I find that highly contrived and out of character for Nanny.
|
|
|
Post by mike on Mar 1, 2009 11:24:39 GMT -5
I kinda felt that way too about Nanny---but I ended up cutting her some slack since he was her son after all. As bad as he was--as bad as she knew he was, she still was his mother and I am sure still felt a mother's love for her son. In the end, she did the right thing---not giving a care to her own life in order to save Holly's.
|
|
|
Post by tidewater on Mar 1, 2009 13:31:15 GMT -5
I can totally buy that as a mother she would be motivated to assisting him in escaping but what I can't buy is that she willing call Holly to lure her into Faison's clutches.
Also, what was the purpose of Faison beating up his mother in the park? He was never a thug. BTW, she looked fine to me afterwards.
|
|